A text by ecologist Matthew Creasey, based on his presentation during the Symbiotic Systems workshop. Matt was also a participant in the Cornwall workshop.
Architect – from the Greek arkhitéktōn, meaning ‘chief builder’
- Arch – chief or principle
- Tecton – builder
- Derivatives such as architective, meaning ‘used in or proper for building’, may be formed from the Latin tectus, meaning ‘to cover, shelter or protect’
Keystone – “A central stone at the summit of an arch…locking the whole together” *
Keystone species – “a species exerting a major influence on an ecosystem, [especially] one on whose activities the survival of other species depends” *
*definitions from the OED online (http://www.oed.com)
Humans and ecology:
Since the 1st or 2nd century BC, and perhaps earlier, various peoples have positioned keystones at the zenith of their arches, to lock the other stones in place and distribute weight evenly among them. Roman architects, master builders, used them in the construction of the cities to provide shelter, food and water to their flourishing civilizations, which in turn were incendiary for so much human artistic, scientific, political, societal and technological innovation.
However, although such keystones have been at the top and centre of human building for millennia, they have held their place in the anthropogenic world for a brief moment compared to the period of time for which another type of keystone has been in its position, locking together Earth’s ecosystems. Keystone species are organisms which fulfill a pivotal and structural role within ecosystems. Their influence cascades through the web of life and to remove such a species would leave a missing link causing the collapse of many ecological interactions and other local extinctions. One example of a keystone species is the humble fig wasp (Agaonidae). Each wasp is only 2mm long and lives for just 2 or 3 days, but they are the sole pollinators of fig trees (Ficus spp., Moraceae). Females hatch out of the fruits, taking with them pollen, which they transport to other figs in the area as they find figs in which to lay their own eggs. And the figs are vital. Not only do they produce bounties of fruit which feed many species, but different trees do so at different times, meaning that figs are almost always available somewhere in the forest. Thus a critical food source for a whole pantheon of species relies on an insect no larger than a flea.
But keystones are a comparatively small element of both ecological systems, and of human architectural design. So why have I focused on them here? Well, I think they exemplify two themes which are central to the concept of machine wilderness: (1) the interconnectedness of our world, and (2) how introducing or removing a single element in a system or structure can have a fundamental impact on that system’s ability to function. In explorations of machines in the wild, other ecological concepts like food webs, niches, and mutualisms could all also provide inspiration for ways to join the the human and wild made.
At Machine Wilderness Kernow, various ecological concepts were explored in the mudflats and woods of the Cornish coast. Water, reeds, the salt and the air. Most groups envisaged and built waterborne creatures. One swam across the surface of the creek, propelled by the wind, and harvesting plastics using its extended arm. The creation of a 2nd group took the shape of an electrically charged, wind and solar powered jellyfish, which collected and filtered out pollutants from the murky waters of the creek. Another lived freely among the reeds. Each individual collected biological, climatic, or chemical information, and shared this with others of its kind, collectively building a repository of information as deep as the surrounding mud.
In Amsterdam, participants spent their time exploring the lakes and woods of Amstelpark, deep within the urban landscape. Inspired by other projects which captured methane, a key gas in global climate change, which is produced by many forms of life.
Wherever we are in the world, the concepts of Machine Wilderness could, will, have relevance in an evolving and changing world. Two different approaches naturally emerge when exploring and implementing the ideas of Machine Wilderness – (1) biomimicry and (2) integration. In the first, humans can find inspiration from processes and species in the wild, and copy their designs to create new and innovative machines. In the second, through collaboration between ecologists with a complex understanding of biological systems, and the creative minds of artists, inventors, technologists and creators, we can find ways to integrate human made creations into natural systems, or natural phenomena into our human worlds. Thus, perhaps, we can bridge the gap between the wild and the human, reach common ground, and explore new, innovation and sustainable possibilities for the future.
And finally to return to the humble fig wasp, one might say that they are already ‘bionic’ organisms. The figs into which females must bore through to lay their eggs, are tremendously strong. To puncture them, the wasps have developed zinc tipped ovipositors, metalled spearheads on biotic birth canals to solve a puzzle of nature. Mechanics which truly are wild.